Tuesday 9 February 2021

Calcium and water write up

 

The video above explains the law of conservation of mass

Assignment:   Write up our lab on Calcium and water. 

 Your lab must include the following

1.  First and Last names of all investigators

2. Purpose of lab:  write about how this lab illustrates the law of conservation of mass.  Explain how the lab relates to the law.  Describe the teacher demo that preceded this lab.

3.a Materials: write a complete list of materials that we used including the litmus paper at the end.
b.  Safety:  list the safety precaustions for this lab

4. Procedure: Draw a cartoon to describe the step by step procedure  that is so well written that another person could read it and replicate your actions exactly

5.  What is the question we are trying to answer?  For example there were two possible gases that came out of this reaction.  What gases were they?
6. Results:  Describe in detail what happened after you did the procedure.  Include any photos you took.  How did you know you made the gas, which gas?  And was it Calcium hydroxide that was made? How do you know?  

7.  Write your conclusion in paragraph form.  


EVALUATION   IS OUT OF 25 IN TOTAL

5
presentation is out of 5.  for 5/5 it is typed  with illustrations or photos and emailed to msngscience@gmail.com.     for 4/5 it is pretty good but there are a few spelling mistakes.  for 0-3 out of 5 it is in pencil or messy.  I prefer this to be printed

10
Clear writing is out of 10.  for 9/10 or 10/10, it is written with no English mistakes and it clearly communicates each part of the lab report.    7-8/10  it is very well written     for 5-6/10 some parts are not so clear and the reader must guess what you are trying to say.  0-4/10, it is minimally communicating what happened

10
Paragraphs are insightful and your observations are well done. this is out of 10.
             9-10/10,   your observations and conclusions are well written and logical.  It is brilliant
              7-8/10   your observations and conclusions are very well done
               5-6   your conclusions don't really logically follow from your results
                0-4   your conclusions are not relating to your results at all
      

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
write all names and who contributed what including the % of their contribution. so two people who contributed equally would be50%